Emotional Neglect vs Emotional Abuse
In this series I have mentioned emotional neglect and emotional abuse but what is the difference between them?
Emotional abuse
Emotional abuse is an active act. This is where the child is told repeatedly certain things about themselves, their situation or their role in the family.
These things are harmful. The person saying it may deny the intention is to course harm and genuinely believe that however, it does cause significant harm.
Being on the receiving end of this can leave you believing it or fighting against it and it will have a long-term impact.
In the worst instances, there is a deliberateness to this. No one wants to accept that people exist alongside us that will behave that way but the truth is they do.
Emotional Neglect
Emotional neglect is a form of child abuse but it is much more passive, it’s a failure to act.
The parent or caregiver may themselves be very emotionally immature and not recognise that part of their role is to teach their child how to manage their emotions. They fail to help soothe and regulate when they are experiencing big emotions and the child struggles to learn these skills.
Instead they may model the parent’s ways of coping. An emotionally immature adult may get angry a lot because they can’t regulate their own feelings and anger becomes the default. Or they lock up their emotions in boxes and pretend they aren’t there. In this last example they usually seep out in unpleasant ways for those around them. Through passive aggressiveness, sarcasm, the threat of violence being contained.
The parent may also claim the victim role and be helpless and demand support and help to regulate from their children so the child ends up being the caregiver rather than the other way around.
Whatever way it presents, the child learns that they cannot rely on their parent for emotional support.
Both types of people, those who are emotionally abusive or emotionally neglectful may not appear that way from the outside. It’s why emotional abuse is so hard to recognise even for the person who’s been on the receiving end of it and it’s why their experiences get invalidated so often.
In the end, you are very likely to become the scapegoat if you challenge it or try and let people understand what’s going on. The person challenging it is the one causing conflict and problems in the agreed upo narrative. The experience they’ve had isn’t seen.
There still appears to be a concept of hierarchy in terms of childhood trauma and abuse. Emotional abuse and definitely emotional neglect are the ones minimised the most. “You should be grateful XYZ didn’t happen to you instead”. “You’re so lucky that you didn’t have to go through this”.
The truth is though lifelong harm is caused by both of these experiences and the process of even recognising it in ourself can be very difficult as it means re-writing the story of our lives.


